![]() Please wait while updating issue type...
Could not save your changes
This issue has been changed since you started editing it
Data that has been changed is highlighted in red below. Undo your changes to see the updated information
You have changed this issue, but haven't saved your changes yet. To save it, press the Save changes button to the right
This issue is blocking the next release
![]() There are no comments
There is nothing attached to this issue
This issue has no duplicates
85ac521
Oct 30, 22:41 - Preceeded by 214668e25c2fcebc4e803342bfd92d983b2d7934
Log entry
fixed issue JPPF-556 Changed files
Affected issues
b3a1677
Oct 30, 22:41 - Preceeded by 8532ae62034434fd7a1ff1b29c4af6a6f95a5db4
Log entry
fixed issue JPPF-556 Changed files
Affected issues
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Really delete this comment?
Really delete this comment?
Really delete this comment?
Really delete this comment?
Really delete this comment?
Really delete this comment?
Really delete this comment?
The JPPF serialization was designed to serialize/deserialize classes that do not implement Serializable, unlike the standard Java serialization. This can happen when your application uses classes (for example in a 3rd-party library) for which you don't have the source code. If you want faster serialization with smaller serialized format, you could use the Kryo serialization sample (which I had to fix too).
Really delete this comment?